On September 29, 2014, The Chilean government submitted its Intended Nationally Determined Contribution (INDC) that includes two emission mitigation targets for 2030. The unconditional target is a 30% reduction of GHG emissions-intensity of GDP below 2007 levels by 2030, which is equivalent to 222% above 1990 and 75% above 2010 GHG emissions levels excluding LULUCF. The conditional target (conditional on international financial support in the form of grants) is a 35–45% reduction of GHG emissions-intensity of GDP compared to 2007 by 2030, which is equivalent to 154–198% above 1990 and to 38-62% above 2010 GHG emissions levels excluding LULUCF. We rate these targets as “inadequate”.
The “inadequate” rating indicates that Chile’s commitment is not in line with interpretations of a “fair” approach to reach a 2°C pathway. This means it is not consistent with limiting warming to below 2°C: if most other countries followed the Chilean approach, global warming would exceed 3–4°C. Chile’s reduction target could therefore be strengthened to reflect its high capability.
Chile’s INDC is less ambitious than the draft the Chilean Ministry for the Environment released in December 2014, analysed by the CAT and rated inadequate.”
The draft INDC contained two sets of targets (option A and B) for 2025 and 2030. The unconditional target in the INDC is less ambitious than all the 2030 options in the draft. The final INDC’s conditional target range covers the full range of options A (-40–45%) and B (-35–40%) contained in the draft.
A significant concern is that the final INDC does not set a goal for 2025, and the level set for 2030 is far from a 2° C pathway. If Paris were to set targets only for 2025 INDCs, inadequate efforts such as Chile’s INDC could be improved later when new targets for 2030 are set.
In its INDC, Chile also proposes the sustainable management and recovery of 100,000 hectares of forest by 2030 and the afforestation of 100,000 hectares (Government of Chile, 2015). Chile is one of the few countries that separates the LULUCF sector target from other emissions, which does increase the transparency of the proposed actions.
Under the Copenhagen accord, Chile proposed to undertake Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMAs) to reach an emissions level 20% below business-as-usual (BAU) by 2020 (as projected from 2007). We also rated this target “inadequate”.
With currently implemented policies, Chile is on track to meet its unconditional INDC target. However, Chile will need to implement additional policies to reach its 2020 pledge and 2030 conditional INDC target.
It has various NAMA proposals moving towards implementation, which may lead the way to further emission reductions in the future. Chile has made great progress towards decarbonisation with the Non-Conventional Renewable Energy Law (NCRE) and the carbon tax for fixed sources (turbines or boilers above 50 MWth) of USD 5/tCO2 which will come into effect in January 2017. However, Chile will need to urgently implement additional policies to reach its proposed targets.
Chile’s INDC includes two emissions mitigation targets for 2030:
The GHG emissions-intensity target does not include emissions or removals from the forestry sector. Chile proposes the sustainable management and recovery of 100,000 hectares of forest by 2030 with estimated emissions reductions of 0.6 MtCO2e per year from 2030. Additionally, Chile commits to afforest 100,000 hectares, with mostly native species, that are estimated to capture between 0.9–1.2 MtCO2e per year from 2030 (Government of Chile, 2015).
Chile has proposed to undertake NAMAs to reach an emissions reduction of 20% below BAU including LULUCF in 2020 (as projected from 2007). We estimate this is an absolute pledged emissions level of 119 MtCO2e in 2020 excluding emissions from LULUCF. This is equivalent to an increase of 138% from 1990 GHG emissions levels excluding LULUCF.
We rate Chile’s pledge for 2020 and Chile’s INDC emission reduction targets for 2030 “inadequate.”
The “inadequate” rating indicates that the proposed commitments are not in line with interpretations of a “fair” approach to reach a 2°C pathway. This means it is not consistent with limiting warming to below 2°C unless other countries make much deeper reductions and comparably greater effort. The reduction target could therefore be strengthened to reflect Chile’s economic capability.
Chile’s projected emissions levels in 2020, 2025 and 2030 are in the “inadequate” range. Most effort sharing approaches lead to similar levels of emission allowances. The upper end of the “medium” range is determined by effort sharing approaches focusing on equal cumulative per capita emissions. To be in line with the most stringent approaches, which focus on capability, Chile would need even further emissions reductions.
Between 1990 and 2010, Chile’s emissions increased by 84% from 50 MtCO2e to 92 MtCO2e, excluding LULUCF. Taking into account Chile’s current policies, we estimate that emissions will reach 134–138 MtCO2e per year in 2020 excluding LULUCF, which represents a 169-177% increase from 1990 emission levels and an increase of 47-51% from 2010 emission levels. We project that emissions in 2030 will be 161–167 MtCO2e (224-234% above 1990 levels and 78-82% above 2010 levels) excluding LULUCF.
As pointed out in the INDC, Chile has a Climate Action Plan from 2016–2021, which takes a cross-cutting mitigation perspective. The country pursues a National Strategy for Sustainable Buildings, which includes energy, water, waste and health goals. Furthermore, the country approved a carbon tax of USD 5/tCO2 for fixed sources (turbines or boilers above 50 MWth) in 2014, which will come into effect in January 2017.
One of the most significant implemented policies is the Non-Conventional Renewable Energy Law (NCRE). The NCRE aims to achieve a 20% renewable energy target in 2025 by committing 45% of the installed capacity in 2014–2025 to come from non-conventional renewable energy sources. Chile aims to fulfil future energy requirements by developing non-conventional renewable energy sources, such as geothermal, wind, solar, tidal, biomass and small hydroelectric plants.
The government’s Energy Agenda 2014–2018 (Government of Chile, 2014a) proposes additional policies that may contribute to further emissions reductions such as the implementation of energy management systems in major energy consumers, efforts to decouple energy consumption from revenues in SMEs and commitments from the federal administration to reduce added consumption from the public sector. The Energy Agenda affirms support for the NCRE and prioritises activities to improve energy efficiency. To address energy security concerns, the Energy Agenda also highlights the current Government’s intention to develop LNG import facilities and invest in oil and gas exploration projects. Overall, this is a significant shift away from previous Government plans to meet increasing demand with additional coal fired power plants considering coal consumption almost tripled over the period 1990–2010 (O’Ryan et al., 2010).
Between 2010–2013 the government implemented a number of policies on appliance labelling, energy efficiency, fuel efficiency standards and electricity infrastructure. Policies that stand out are the Energy Efficiency Seal (2013) and Energy Efficiency Action Plan 2012–2020 (Government of Chile, 2012), which aims to set a suitable legal framework for energy efficiency implementation across different sectors towards a 15% energy efficiency improvement by 2025. The Energy Efficiency Action Plan is part of the government’s Energy Agenda.
In 2012 the government introduced emissions limits for light, medium and heavy duty vehicles (Ministerio del Medio Ambiente, 2012). Finally, Chile has implemented subsidies for power transmission lines to facilitate access to the grid for renewable energy installations (Chile Library of Congress, 2012) as well as modifications to the general law of electrical services for power generation using unconventional sources of renewable energies (Chile Library of Congress, 2013). All of these policies facilitate Chile’s transition to low-carbon development.
The LULUCF sector has been a sink of around 50 MtCO2e in the period 1990–2010, which is roughly equal to the non-LULUCF 1990 emissions (Ministerio del Medio Ambiente, 2014b). Notably, in earlier emissions inventories a lower LULUCF sink was reported. The change is a result of methodological improvements in the latest national inventory report. The most significant of the changes for the LULUCF sector are the inclusion of the carbon pool that corresponds to below ground living biomass of forest plantations, which increased GHG removals (Ministerio del Medio Ambiente, 2014b).
Historical emissions were taken from the latest national inventory report for the period until 2010 (Ministerio del Medio Ambiente, 2014b).
2020 pledge and 2030 INDC
The 2020 pledge was not communicated with a reference pathway. We have therefore calculated Chile’s 2020 pledge using as reference the 2007 BAU scenario from BCG (2013). This pathway closely resembles the 2007 BAU presented by Searle (2011) on behalf of the Chilean Government in the same context. As the pledge covers emissions including LULUCF, the emissions level resulting from the pledge is first calculated based on BAU emissions including LULUCF. Projected LULUCF emissions (BCG, 2013) are then subtracted to arrive at the pledged emissions level excluding LULUCF, which is shown in the graph. The BAU shown in the graph excludes LULUCF.
Both targets presented in Chile’s INDC were quantified based on the “medium case” GDP projections from the MAPS Chile project (Government of Chile, 2014b; Ministerio del Medio Ambiente (2014c). These projections are referred in the INDC and project a GDP (CLP$ 2011) growth of 149% over the period 2007 to 2030. The current policy projections are based on the same assumptions on GDP growth.
Current policy projections
The upper end of the current policy projections range is based on the scenario ‘Energias Renovables No Convencionales’ from the maps Chile project. For the lower end of the range, the projected impact of the adopted carbon tax of 5 USD/tCO2 is subtracted from this scenario (Government of Chile, 2014b). We show a range here to account for the unknown overlap between the Non-Conventional Renewable Energy Law and the carbon tax.
GLOBE International. (2013). Climate Legislation Study: A Review of Climate Change Legislation in 33 Countries.
Government of Chile (2010). Chile's pledge to the Copenhagen Accord. Compiled in: Compilation of information on nationally appropriate mitigation actions to be implemented by Parties not included in Annex I to the Convention, UNFCCC (2011)
Government of Chile (2014b). MAPS Chile. Resultados de Fase 2.
Ministerio del Medio Ambiente (2011). Chile’s 2nd National Communication Santiago.
Ministerio del Medio Ambiente (2014a). Draft of the intended nationally determined contribution (INDC) in the dontext of the 2015 climate agreement to be adopted at the twenty-first donference of the parties (COP21) of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
Ministerio del Medio Ambiente (2014b). Chile’s National Greenhouse Gas Inventory, 1990–2010
Ministerio del Medio Ambiente (2014c). Antecedentes para la Contribución Nacional Tentativa de Chile (Mitigación) ante la Convención Marco de Naciones Unidas de Cambio Climático.
O`Ryan, Raúl; Díaz, Manuel; Clerc, Jacques (2010). Emission data Universidad de Chile
 Due to the inclusion of more effort sharing studies, the “medium” range for Chile has changed compared to the assessments in previous years. As a result of this, we changed the rating of the 202 pledge from “medium” to “inadequate”, even though there has been no change in the pledged emissions level for 2020. More information can be found here.