The CAT Climate Governance series seeks to produce a practical framework for assessing a government’s readiness - both from an institutional and governance point of view - to ratchet up climate policy and implement adequate transformational policies on the ground, to enable the required economy-wide transformation towards a zero emissions society.
We have set up a framework that assesses and scores a number of indicators, where we rate various aspects of governance. This allows us to establish a common basis on which to compare climate governance across countries as well as identify areas of improvement and highlight positive developments. We have applied this framework at both a national level and on key emissions-intensive sectors of the economy. In Indonesia's case we have focused on the electricity supply sector.
Assessment of national level readiness
The assessment of high-level government leadership as well as the quality of government decision making in Indonesia shows moderate political commitment to climate mitigation, but the need to scale up climate action is not a common element of the president’s discourse.
While there has been continuity between various administrations regarding the general direction of climate mitigation policy, reducing greenhouse gas emissions is not a top priority and has largely focused on the forestry sector instead of on the need to decarbonise the energy system.
Coordination mechanisms do exist, but a stronger focus on climate mitigation and consistency of targets and policies across ministries is necessary. There is not a high-level focal point within all relevant line ministries. Indonesia lacks an independent institution to advise the government on decarbonisation measures and country specific analysis is not yet suited to adequately promote mitigation options.
There is significant room for improvement in Indonesia’s processes for policy development, implementation and review. The government has not defined a Paris-compatible decarbonisation pathway and lacks comprehensive climate mitigation legislation. While it has established a transparency framework, it could improve on its ability to monitor progress towards its NDC and needs to introduce a ratcheting-up mechanism to scale up its ambition.
Ambitious climate policy is at risk of being undermined by the close ties between the government and the coal industry as well as the palm oil sector. Survey data suggests that more work is needed to engage the public in climate action.
Ratings and Recommendations
The following section outlines the results of the analysis for each of the different categories and criteria as well as our recommendations for each category of governance.
- The President could strengthen his political commitment to, and prioritisation of, climate change mitigation, particularly with respect to the linkages to other national priorities (poverty, unemployment, growth, electrification of rural areas).
- Establish climate change units within the Ministries of Agriculture, Energy, Industry and Transport.
- Establish an independent entity to advise the government on decarbonisation strategies.
- Define a concrete Paris-compatible 2050 decarbonisation pathway and anchor it in climate change legislation.
- Establish a ratcheting up mechanism to scale up climate action.
- Increase public awareness campaigns on the need for climate action.
- Develop a standardised framework to transparently and consistently address the influence and leverage of interest groups aligned with fossil fuel industries in climate policy and legislative processes.
Indonesia's Climate Governance
These tables from the report give an overview and analysis of the key factors of Indonesia's governance to enable effective climate action. We look at the country's key institutions, strategies, targets and legislation, as well at a sectoral level for the electricity supply sector.
Assessment of sectoral level readiness
The report also assesses the readiness of Indonesia's electricity supply sector. See the report for details.
This report on Indonesia is part of the CAT Climate Governance series where we look at the governance models of 6 countries and assess them using a consistent methodology. You can use the links below to find the assessments of the other 5 countries as well as information about the series itself and details on how the assessments were carried out.