Ethiopia

Critically Insufficient4°C+
World
NDCs with this rating fall well outside of a country’s “fair share” range and are not at all consistent with holding warming to below 2°C let alone with the Paris Agreement’s stronger 1.5°C limit. If all government NDCs were in this range, warming would exceed 4°C.
Highly insufficient< 4°C
World
NDCs with this rating fall outside of a country’s “fair share” range and are not at all consistent with holding warming to below 2°C let alone with the Paris Agreement’s stronger 1.5°C limit. If all government NDCs were in this range, warming would reach between 3°C and 4°C.
Insufficient< 3°C
World
NDCs with this rating are in the least stringent part of a country’s “fair share” range and not consistent with holding warming below 2°C let alone with the Paris Agreement’s stronger 1.5°C limit. If all government NDCs were in this range, warming would reach over 2°C and up to 3°C.
2°C Compatible< 2°C
World
NDCs with this rating are consistent with the 2009 Copenhagen 2°C goal and therefore fall within a country’s “fair share” range, but are not fully consistent with the Paris Agreement long term temperature goal. If all government NDCs were in this range, warming could be held below, but not well below, 2°C and still be too high to be consistent with the Paris Agreement 1.5°C limit.
1.5°C Paris Agreement Compatible< 1.5°C
World
This rating indicates that a government’s NDCs in the most stringent part of its “fair share” range: it is consistent with the Paris Agreement’s 1.5°C limit.
Role model<< 1.5°C
World
This rating indicates that a government’s NDC is more ambitious than what is considered a “fair” contribution: it is more than consistent with the Paris Agreement’s 1.5°C limit.

Overview

Under current policy projections, GHG emissions in Ethiopia are expected to be in the range of 185–255 MtCO2e in 2030 (excluding. LULUCF), compared to historic emission levels of 103 MtCO2e excluding LULUCF in 2013 (from +79% to +147% relative to 2010 levels). This emissions range reflects uncertainty around the implementation of climate-related policies. For example, Ethiopia’s Second National Communication provides a new BAU scenario where the emissions level in 2030 is significantly lower than the one in the NDC. We assume this new BAU scenario to include policies put forward under the First Growth and Transformation Plan (GTP I)– which is a five-year plan put forward by the government to enhance the economy—and we use this projection as the basis for the upper end of the range of our current policy scenario. Conversely, the Second Growth and Transformation Plan (GTP II) reiterates the targets put forward in the NDC (based on the CRGE strategy) to be achieved by 2020 (Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, 2016), which represents the lower-end of the range of our current policy projections. In contrast to the GTP I, no progress report has been published on the state of implementation of GTP II by the government.

Ethiopia is experiencing high economic growth, with rising per capita incomes, and falling poverty rates. On average, GDP grew at a rate 10.5% during the period 2005/06–2015/16 but has since slowed to 8%. In the Second Growth and Transformation Plan running until 2020 Ethiopia aims at an annual growth of 11%, while projections from the Government’s Second National Communication envision sustained economic growth up to 2030 (set at 8.4% per year).

Latest publications

Stay informed

Subscribe to our newsletter