Overall rating
Highly insufficient

Policies and action
against modelled domestic pathways

Highly insufficient
< 4°C World

NDC target
against modelled domestic pathways

Highly insufficient
< 4°C World

NDC target
against fair share

Highly insufficient
< 4°C World
Climate finance
Not assessed
Net zero target


before 2060

Comprehensiveness rated as

Land use & forestry
Not significant


We evaluate China’s net zero target as: Poor.

China submitted its Mid-Century Long-Term Low Greenhouse Gas Emission Development Strategy (LTS) on October 28, 2021 to the UNFCCC, which contains the country’s commitment to reach “carbon neutrality before 2060”. The commitment was first declared at the UN General Assembly in September 2020 by President Xi Jinping (FMPRC, 2020).

The Long-Term Strategy (LTS) seems to confirm it covers only CO2 emissions in the official submission, whereas previously the CAT assumed the coverage was for all GHGs. The target is not yet enshrined in official law but has become a core focus and narrative across all national and subnational planning documents, government notices, and politburo convenings, which was reaffirmed in China’s 2022 “Two Sessions” (Xinhua, 2022). If China’s net zero target were to cover all GHG emissions, its long-term strategy could be within range of mid-century Paris Agreement compatible emissions levels, although compatibility also depends on the shape of the pathway (Yvonne Deng et al., 2020).

Due to the size of China’s emissions, this difference can make up to 0.1°C more or less warming in 2100. However, the LTS lacks a clear plan on how China plans to finance its short and long-term transition, estimated to be in the order of USD 76tn over the next 30 years (Liu and You, 2021). Given the LTS submission does not meet the majority of our considerations for a best-practice approach in LTS formulation, we evaluate China’s net-zero target as “Poor”.

China’s “Poor” rating could be upgraded to “Average” if it made minor improvements. Explicit clarification on any of the categories “International aviation and shipping”, “reductions/removals outside of on territory”, “separate reduction & removal targets”, and “carbon dioxide removal” would pass the rating threshold of our methods.

The emissions coverage of China’s LTS target has also been subject to much debate (whether it covers CO2 or GHGs only). If China’s target covered all GHGs, the country would receive an “advanced” rating in this category, and an “Average” rating overall.

CAT analysis of net zero target

Comprehensiveness of net zero target design
Target year: Before 2060
Emissions coverage

Target covers emissions / sectors partially (under 95% coverage)

International aviation and shipping

The target excludes both international aviation and shipping

Reductions or removals outside of own borders

Relies on international offset credits or reserves right to use them to meet net zero

Legal Status

Net zero target in proposed legislation or in a policy document

Separate reduction & removal targets

No separate emission reduction and removal targets

Review Process

Non-legally binding process to review net zero target OR In process of establishing a review cycle for net zero

Carbon dioxide removal

No transparent assumptions on carbon dioxide removals

Comprehensive planning

Some information on the anticipated pathway or measures for achieving net zero is available, but with limited detail.

Clarity on fairness of target

Some explanation on why the target is fair

Ten key elements


  • Target year – China aims to reach “carbon neutrality” before 2060

  • Emissions coverage – China committed to reach “carbon neutrality” before 2060, confirming only CO2 emissions are covered, but not all greenhouse gases. While researchers at Tsinghua University and China’s COP26 delegate Xie Zhenhua previously claimed that all greenhouse gases were covered by China’s net zero target, the LTS submitted has clarified that it covers CO2 only: it has an explicit reference to ‘carbon neutrality’, it links to the 2030 carbon dioxide peaking NDC target, and has a separate discussion on non-CO2 emissions.

  • International aviation and shipping – China provides unclear information on its intention to cover international aviation and shipping in its long-term target.
    • The LTS, however, emphasises the importance of these sectors' greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions in international shipping and aviation for implementation of the Paris Agreement’s temperature goals and states it will “actively expand the application of new and clean energy in…aviation and shipping, such as electricity, hydrogen energy, natural gas and advanced liquid biofuels”, “promote the application of low-carbon energy ships and explore the application of biomass fuels and other synthetic fuels in civil aviation”, and “promote the establishment of science-based mechanisms for reducing GHGs emission from international shipping and aviation” in its climate governance system.
    • For the Special Administrative Region of Macao, China states it will “accelerate the application of fuel-saving technologies and measures, actively promote the use of aviation biofuels, and strengthen low-carbon renovation and operation management of airports” and outlines the intention to apply China’s Certified Emission Reductions (CCER) and the ICAO’s Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA) to Macao’s aviation industry.

  • Reductions or removals outside of own territory – China provides no information on its intention to use international offset credits to meet its net zero target.

Target architecture

  • Separate reduction & removal targets – China provides no information on its intention to communicate separate emission reduction and removal targets. While no separate removal targets have been specified, China implicitly suggests a large role for carbon removal in its 2060 target as China only targets 80% share of non-fossil energy in 2060. This is also suggested in He (2021) - the analysis that supported the development of the target—where 2°C and 1.5°C compatible emission pathways show forest sinks of -7 to -8 GtCO2e/year and removals (from CCS, BECCS) from -5 to -9 GtCO2e/year.

  • Review process – China provides no information on its intention to establish a review cycle for its net zero and intermediate targets. The LTS states that China will improve the legal system surrounding the strategy and to continuously “screen and modify the current laws and regulations that are not compatible with carbon peaking and carbon neutrality and strengthen the coordination between laws and regulations”. While the process is not explicitly outlined, progress towards achieving the target will likely be revisited annually at government convenings and updated in subsequent Five Year Plan cycles, which have legal basis.


  • Carbon dioxide removal – China provides no information whether it intends to communicate transparent assumptions on carbon dioxide removals, aside from general statements on its intended dependence on increasing natural carbon sinks and technology-based solutions including CCUS in electric power, steel, cement and chemical industries.

  • Comprehensive planning – China has pledged to reach peak carbon emissions by 2030 in its NDC, also reiterated in China’s 14th Five Year Plan (2021–2025) and the Action Plan For Carbon Dioxide Peaking Before 2030 (the “N” in the “1+N” framework). The LTS also contains numerous mid-term sectoral targets and visions with implications for emission pathways, including:
    • Implement green building standards in 100% of new buildings by 2025
    • Achieve around 40% market share of vehicles sold for NEVs (new energy vehicles, including EVs)
    • Strive to reduce carbon emission from the transportation sector by more than 10% in 2030 compared with 2020, and achieve more than 30% reduction compared with 2020 by 2050 (Macao)
    • Achieve a 25% forest coverage rate in the country
    • Peaking and gradually reducing coal consumption during the 15th FYP period (2026–2030)
    • Reach a peak-plateau in oil consumption during the 15th FYP period

No other intermediate targets were given, nor were measures outlined, although the government will periodically release updated plans in a five-year cycle (more sectoral details on the current FYP period is due to be released in 2022). While several scenario pathways towards 2060 have been developed, the government has not officially adopted any as of April 2022.

  • Clarity on fairness of target – China provides little information on its intention to explain the target’s fairness, although the LTS contains direct references to fairness considerations. There is no explicit explanation on why China’s 2060 target can be considered fair.

Good practice

The Climate Action Tracker has defined the following good practice for all ten key elements of net zero targets. Countries can refer to this good practice to design or enhance its net-zero targets.

Latest publications

Stay informed

Subscribe to our newsletter